“Automated Finance, Human Consequences: Plazo Urges Caution on AI in the Markets”
“Automated Finance, Human Consequences: Plazo Urges Caution on AI in the Markets”
Blog Article
At a regional summit of Asia’s most promising technocrats and business students, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—offered an unusual message: slow down.
From Manila, where financial optimism runs high — He didn’t celebrate victory margins or machine performance.
“The machine may be faster. But are we still the ones deciding what matters?”
???? **Joseph Plazo: A Technologist Sounding the Alarm**
Plazo is not new to this space. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
Yet even with these results, he insists—performance isn’t the only metric.
“Optimisation is only part of the equation,” Plazo explained. “Direction, purpose—those remain human.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. The algorithm was correct—but profoundly unaware.”
???? **When Pausing Is a Form of Leadership**
AI’s appeal lies in its instant execution. But at what cost?
“Friction is not failure,” Plazo told the audience. “It is the space where judgment lives.”
Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Are we outsourcing more info our ethics to an equation?
- Are we listening to voices that can’t be graphed?
- Can we stand by this choice if it goes wrong—publicly, transparently?
???? **As Fintech Booms, Where Are the Ethical Guardrails?**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “AI is moving capital—but is it moving it in the right direction?”
He cited the 2024 collapse of two Hong Kong hedge funds.
“No one made a mistake. But no one questioned the machine either.”
???? **Plazo’s Vision: Trading Systems with Moral Intelligence**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“We don’t need more speed. We need better questions.”
That idea is already drawing attention.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A necessary reckoning for financial technology.”
???? **The Final Warning: Crashes Don’t Always Start Loudly**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“Emotion won’t trigger the fall. Certainty will.”
It wasn’t fearmongering. It was foresight.
Because when machines take over the trades, leadership cannot go offline.